| 8.) Then A GC-MS ( Gas chromatography- mass spectroscopy) should be run. A GC is nothing more than a Oven with a Capillary column 25 - 60 meters in length in it, which the oil is injected into. The oven then has a temperature setting: as the temperature rises the lighter more volatile chemicals leave the column and are hit with an electron beam in the MS. The image of the shattered chemical is copied onto a electromagnetic plate. The image is then stored in the computer. After all the chemicals from the oil have been run you can go into the computer software and match the spectrums against a library of spectrums. Matches are made with a quality percentage. Quality matches over 90% are most likely the match, but not always. This is why you need to run standards of chemicals and develop a library of with own method ( temperature profile, column type same GC-MS)
Once you get good at identifying the individual spectrum patterns it's like knowing different aromas, but visually.
8a.) Don't trust GC analysis alone. Many companies just use GC without the MS. This is dangerous even if you have a complete library of standards, which very few people on earth have. GCs are good for a cheap and cheerful look at the relative percentages of components in an oil, but they are only analyzed by retention time. (Retention time: the time a chemical comes out of the GCs column) There can be four or five chemicals which have the same retention time, thus a 1-5 chance of being correct.
This is not to say a well trained analyst cannot have good results. It means that quantitative analysis is better performed in conjunction with Gc-Ms.
8b.) Have as many scientific studies of the oils you provide with chemical data to cross reference. The information on an oil is only as good as the research is. We have found erroneous data on oils from recognized people in the field of essential oils and Aromatherapy
8c.) The rule at Kobashi is don't trust one testing method: do them all. Cross reference is the only sure method to get to the truth. In this day and age of production and consumption, there is always a question that must be ask:
What path does the product take and what are the motivations of the people involved?
What compromises is the supplier willing to make? BraveHeart was willing to give up his life for freedom. My freedom is to make no compromise. Truth is what it is. In order to know the truth one must look at a subject in it's entirety.
What is it that a person wants?
Is that persons interest in yours.
Article by Scott Ballard, buyer / analyst for Kobashi Essential Oils
Even if you go straight to the grower / distiller they may not be testing their oils. Those that do test most certainly aren't looking for unwanted phthalates, very few look for pesticides or herbicides.
Very few farmers or distillers know what the chemical composition should look like. This is not to say that there are not farmers or distillers out there that are honest and know what they are doing. If that was the case I wouldn't have a chance and I would have to grow and distill all the oils I supply, which is almost impossible.
The oils we supply come from all over the world. I'm sorry to say that only if you know the farmers and/or distillers and are an expert with a gc-ms testing facility will you get close to the truth of whether an essential oil is pure or not and the correct chemo-type.
Even if you were to belong to a group which says they are a certifying body for essential oil companies, even if this certified body test all there oils and approves them as pure, unless they know the exact source (where the oils came from and are doing indepth testing), they still could be adulterated. There are so many cheap, natural and synthetic chemicals on the market, so many year to year and origin to origin variations in essential oils, that sophisticated criminals can fool the best.
If we think the best possible way to go down is the Pharmaceutical route, then we would be fooling our selves, as this would lead to standardization, which in my book is adulteration.
I believe nature should be left alone, as essential oils are evolving. We all know the strongest are the most diverse in nature. Plants are weaker against attack when they are standardized. People and animals get weaker when they are inbred. What makes us think eliminating changes in an oil, add this and that so they are always the same is going to do anything but help suppliers make more money.
Summary
1.) Best if I buy straight from the grower and/or distiller.
2.) Have a great nose for the oils you purchase.
3.) Do a Gc-Ms (gas chromatography mass spectrum) cross referenced with your own retention library, with other chemical libraries, with published data on the specific oil on a period of years from various sources, chemotypes and origins.
4.) Run as many known origin - distillation samples as possible to judge against.
5.) Look for the ratio % of a number of chemicals within the oil, including very small peak chemicals and look for the chemicals that shouldn't be there and should be there.
6.) If you are using a split less injection with Pentane, Acetone or Ethanol carrier in the test sample to increase column life (acetone doesn't help column life) you must do a Head Space Analysis ( heat vile of pure oil and vapors get vacuumed into the Gc-Ms.)
7.) If after all this you even slightly suspect adulteration, synthetic or not, put sample in suspect archive and don't waste any more time. Make a note of who sent you the sample and watch them carefully. They may or may not have done this intentionally.
8.) If you are doing investigative work or going after a charlatan, (which is unfortunately the norm with many essential oil companies) please do a Chiral test to see the enantiomeric distribution % ( chemicals will either have a large + or - chirality, but in nature are almost never -50%+50%:which means its synthetic. Of course you will have to have libraries and information on chirality to judge against.
|